good environment and culture - Graduate Engineer KBR Employee Review

Worklife balance - 40 hrs per week, transparent management

not really anything. KBR was pretty good.

The direct manager demonstrated a high level of professionalism, providing support and treating team members with respect. Colleagues often shared expertise generously and collaborated effectively when opportunities allowed.

• A team leader was assigned leadership responsibilities despite limited experience and no formal leadership training, managing a group of senior and principal engineers. • Communication was often perceived as unprofessional and dismissive, negatively impacting team morale. • Employee engagement was low, with limited collaboration and participation in meetings. • Team members faced significant pressure, and concerns were not always welcomed, leading to hesitation in speaking up. • There were inconsistencies in maintaining professional and respectful workplace communication standards. • Leadership decisions appeared to prioritize internal dynamics over merit and qualifications, with some individuals feeling their growth opportunities were limited. This team leader was perceived as untouchable and fully supported by higher management, raising concerns about long-term development and retention. • At times, the team lead overstepped managerial boundaries, interacting with team members in ways perceived as disrespectful and not aligned with professional standards. • The leadership style relied heavily on micromanagement, with limited understanding of technical complexity and minimal strategic guidance.