employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MissionSquare Retirement

Engaged Employer

Do Not Consider Working For Mission Square Retirement - Retirement Plan Specialist MissionSquare Retirement Employee Review

1.0
Feb 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay and benefits are average

Cons

This corporation is a sinking ship sanctimoniously claiming to be a "Not-For-Profit" and "Serving Those That Serve", blah,blah,blah. This organization has a terrible CEO who staffed key executive positions based on friendship vs. competency. A recent "technology transformation" led by one of her "friends" who can walk on water is an UNMITIGATED DISASTER. Employers and their employees are constantly dissatisfied and angry with the recent "technology upgrades that provide an enhanced experience". Very basic functions once provided to customers are no longer available or do not work consistently. There are very few employees who can think "out of the box" in order to make things happen on behalf of the customer. The vast majority of employees are simple-minded process-driven and the customer be damned. Every day consists of fixing problems that are created soley by incompetent "senior leadership". This will never be resolved until the slate is wiped clean and a new management team is installed.

Explore other reviews about MissionSquare Retirement

5.0
Oct 15, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company hosted an all-employee Open Forum meeting during my first week at the firm. After working in a corporate environment for 15+ years I had come to approach these meetings with a healthy cynicism. To my surprise and delight - I was blown away by the authenticity, energy and culture on display. The people here are earnestly kind and dedicated to the company’s mission and building positive momentum. The average tenure here is 17+ years, which speaks for itself. 10/10, no notes.

Cons

Like I said, no notes.

3.0
Apr 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Workload is manageable Supportive team that is pleasant to work with Exposure to institutional investment processes and portfolio analytics

Cons

Limited upward mobility (biggest con) Frequent changes in leadership can make long-term direction less clear Higher turnover negatively impacts continuity and workload Limited direct exposure to portfolio construction or investment decision-making Organizational processes can be slow to evolve as the firm adapts to a more competitive environment

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All