Amazing company - HR Advisor Rippling Employee Review

5.0
Apr 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work, lots of room for growth and to build out

Cons

Can't think of anything, N/A

Explore other reviews about Rippling

5.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rippling offers a rare combination of a powerful, market-leading product and a leadership team that actually practices what they preach regarding a flat organizational structure. Compensation is competitive and reflects performance. I truly value the autonomy I’m given to manage my desk and the freedom to execute my own strategy.

Cons

The workload is intense and requires strong time-management skills. Additionally, the onboarding and ongoing training are relatively informal, so you need to be a self-starter who is comfortable learning on the fly.

2
3.0
Jan 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, capable peers who care deeply about customers • Strong product with real market pull • Immediate exposure to complex customers and high-impact work

Cons

Extreme scope creep: The TAM role absorbs work from multiple functions without title, pay, or staffing adjustments • Impossible expectations: TAMs are expected to be experts across dozens of products and industries with inadequate training, documentation, or support • Renewal accountability without ownership: TAMs do the work that determines renewals — technical execution, risk mitigation, escalations — while credit and compensation sit elsewhere • Compensation regression: Pay bands have tightened while responsibility, accountability, and stress have increased • Intentional understaffing: Senior leadership has publicly stated that teams are deliberately understaffed as an operating strategy, despite clear downstream impacts on workload, burnout, and attrition • Consistently poor work-life balance: Escalations routinely spill into nights, weekends, and personal time • Micromanagement culture: Activity is closely monitored, second-guessed, and retrospectively critiqued regardless of outcomes • Deflection instead of solutions: Structural concerns about workload and sustainability are met with “be a team player” rhetoric • External-first leadership with rapid churn: Leaders are hired externally rather than developed internally, then quickly cycle out once exposed to the scope, pressure, and lack of structural support — leaving teams beneath them to absorb the fallout • Unrealistic ramp: New hires are expected to learn an enormous product surface area while carrying full production scope • Attrition as a multiplier: Departures immediately increase load on remaining team members, accelerating burnout • Low morale: Teams are exhausted, disengaged, and actively planning exits

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All