Worst Job I've Ever Had - Sales Development Representative (SDR) Rippling Employee Review

1.0
Apr 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay, Centrally located office.

Cons

Non existent onboarding/training Managers who don't know anything about the product, business, internal processes or how to talk to the prospects overly complex tech stack that includes some really great tools they don't even use correctly Over reliance on Generative AI for every single thing Toxic & micromanage-y culture redundant meetings, daily reports that don't help you move the needle Sales Hygiene? They've never heard of it. In my experience, I had "600" accounts and 75% of the accounts were duplicates, fakes, defunct, or miscategorized and no, they will not clean up the data no matter how much you ask. It is just accepted amongst the team (and managers) that everyone is working the same accounts. It's a scrappy, toxic and weird atmosphere.

Explore other reviews about Rippling

5.0
Apr 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work, lots of room for growth and to build out

Cons

Can't think of anything, N/A

3.0
Jan 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, capable peers who care deeply about customers • Strong product with real market pull • Immediate exposure to complex customers and high-impact work

Cons

Extreme scope creep: The TAM role absorbs work from multiple functions without title, pay, or staffing adjustments • Impossible expectations: TAMs are expected to be experts across dozens of products and industries with inadequate training, documentation, or support • Renewal accountability without ownership: TAMs do the work that determines renewals — technical execution, risk mitigation, escalations — while credit and compensation sit elsewhere • Compensation regression: Pay bands have tightened while responsibility, accountability, and stress have increased • Intentional understaffing: Senior leadership has publicly stated that teams are deliberately understaffed as an operating strategy, despite clear downstream impacts on workload, burnout, and attrition • Consistently poor work-life balance: Escalations routinely spill into nights, weekends, and personal time • Micromanagement culture: Activity is closely monitored, second-guessed, and retrospectively critiqued regardless of outcomes • Deflection instead of solutions: Structural concerns about workload and sustainability are met with “be a team player” rhetoric • External-first leadership with rapid churn: Leaders are hired externally rather than developed internally, then quickly cycle out once exposed to the scope, pressure, and lack of structural support — leaving teams beneath them to absorb the fallout • Unrealistic ramp: New hires are expected to learn an enormous product surface area while carrying full production scope • Attrition as a multiplier: Departures immediately increase load on remaining team members, accelerating burnout • Low morale: Teams are exhausted, disengaged, and actively planning exits

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All